GINNY GOOD
Dear Gerard, Oh, well. I'm sorry. This has absolutely wonderful stuff throughout. It's funny, energetic, entirely original, often affecting in a strange way. But I found it too intermittently wonderful...uneven...and while that might be a problem (if it is one) fixable by, susceptible to editing, I'm afraid I also felt that after about sixty pages, the kind of urgency I was hoping would develop didn't seem to be developing. And indeed it goes on that way...at least for me. I didn't feel pulled through the peregrinations strongly enough. There's an episodicness which forces the book to rely on its generally riffflike nature. And, as I've said, I didn't find the riffs consistently strong enough to sustain the somewhat atomic structure. I'm sorry. It's much better than 99% of what I see, and I appreciate the chance to consider it. I hope I'm wrong, and I hope even more that you'll be able to place it elsewhere.
Dear Dan: I got your note. The only parts I understood were the parts about how wonderful it was. You lost me when you had to resort to combining jazz ostinatos with subatomic particle theory in order to explain why you're not going to publish the thing. Gary Fisketjon dissed it too, but with considerably less effusiveness. I appreciated what I was able to understand of your effusiveness, too; don't think I didn't. I also appreciated your having turned Chris Knutsen on to the book. I sent it to him. Feel free to turn it on to anyone you want--like maybe an agent or two. While it's true that I'm having a hell of a time trying to peddle the thing myself (see attachments), it's also true that the way things are set up a person probably does, in the end, much as I would like to think otherwise, need a professional peddler to do his peddling for him. Thanks again.
ASTRAL WEEKEND (OWMM)
Send me fifty, at least to start with. Thanks.
You got it. Thanks. G.
Dear Gerard Jones, OPRAH WIMSFREE & THE MAYONNAISE MAN isn't going to be right for me. I admired it in almost every way, but the tough-gal characterization seemed to me a little relentless after a while (though I'm guessing it may get modified as the book goes on). I think another editor might go for this, however, and because I do, I wonder if you would allow me to give these fifty-four pages to a very good agent I know, a guy named David McCormick who represents a lot of extremely good writers, including some novelists of whom these pages remind me a little. I can send the pages to him directly, if you like, or if you want, you can talk to David first or submit the pages directly to him. Let me know how (and whether) you want to proceed. I'm sorry not to be able to make an offer myself, I thank you for the chance to see this accomplished and funny writing, and I wish you luck. Sincerely, Dan Menaker
Dear Dan: You've really been cool with me. Thanks. Her character gets way modified, yes. She falls apart and gets put back together again worse than Humpty Dumpty. Absolutely, sure about David McCormick. He's at IMG, right? Anyone who edited the Ultimate Golf Book is okay by me. Give him a heads up & I'll send him a bigger chunk or send him what you have, whatever you think's best. Thanks again and again. G.
McCormick has his own (already quite successful) agency now, Collins McCormick, having left IMG a couple of months ago or so. Why don't you email him and ask him how he wants to handle this manuscript (and mention the golf common denominator, by all means)? I've given him a heads-up already, and he has said he'd like to see the work. Good luck. Dan
Will do. Thanks again. G.
You're welcome. And good luck. You're a good writer. I hope to rue the day I didn't make an offer.
|